By: Lea Hilliker and Paige Wright, Nonviolence International Interns
In the wake of the tragedy in Oxford, Michigan, many questions have been raised about gun violence, and school safety. On November 30th, 2021, at approximately 1pm one troubled 15 year old student opened fire on fellow students at Oxford High School. While the student was quickly detained, the impact of this event left many students, faculty, and staff traumatized, numerous injured, and forever took the lives of 4 students. Since this incident, schools are reporting a high number of copycat threats made, which have forced many to close out of precaution for their students. While many officials believe that this individual acted alone, this incident opens up a conversation about the responsibility of school administration in protecting students. Paige and I will discuss our personal experiences associated with preparing for active shooter situations, and address the general ideas associated with the topic of gun violence. Our passion for nonviolence, and activism at Nonviolence International propelled our dedication to recognize the events in the metro Detroit area. Growing up in Northern Michigan, and studying in the Oakland community, I want to acknowledge the pain and grief that my community faces, and recall the potential strategies to help students feel secure in an academic environment.
Unfortunately, this is not the first instance of an active school shooting In the United States, and it will not be the last until we see change in gun control. Since 1970, the United States has had 1,316 school shootings and this number is increasing. Students across the United States and world are being trained to protect themselves in the classroom. Below we discuss both of our experiences in active shooter training and how preparation for a shooting benefits and harms students.
Lea: “During my first year at Oakland University, my school gained national recognition for suggesting the use of hockey pucks in an active shooter situation. The idea sparked from a comment made by the campus Police Chief, who suggested that the hockey pucks could be used in emergency situations. While the technique appeared immature, and insufficient, the overall movement to give hockey pucks to college students built a stronger push to support campus security. The distribution and sale of the hockey pucks were linked to a fundraising campaign that paid for classroom locks, and other safety measures. I think the success of this campaign highlighted the efforts made by faculty and students to protect their fellow Grizzlies, but also illustrated the lack of accountability of the administration in allocating funds towards this project.
Similarly, I know that this tragedy has deeply impacted the lives of many families in the area. Many of my classmates grew up in the area, or have family members that work, or go to school in Oxford. In the past few weeks since, Oakland University, various high schools, and other institutions have offered mental health services to help those in grief, and various community leaders have hosted vigils to support the families of those victims and survivors. The Oxford tragedy deeply transformed the Oakland community, and united the metro Detroit area. I am hopeful that this unity continues, and leads to significant changes in legislation to address problems like gun pollution and male violence.”
Paige: “In my last two years of high school, my high school looked at the dangers of rising school shootings and the unfortunate bomb threats we had received. My administrators decided that students should undergo ALICE training for an active shooter response. ALICE is an acronym for Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter, and Evacuate. The main elements to ALICE training were strong communication on the location of a potential shooter, acting on the defensive without fighting (building barricades, creating distractions, etc.), and leaving when the area was safe.
During an ALICE drill, we were told ahead of time that we would be doing the drill on a certain date but the time was unknown to resemble the unexpected behavior of a shooter. Later an individual masking as an active shooter would enter the school with a blow horn. We then began following ALICE as receptionists alerted the school, students near the shooter locked their doors and hid, and students far from the shooter exited and walked to a close by school. After the training, the student body would gather in the other school as our principal told us how many students “died” and how we did with the overall training. At the end of this, we would return to our regular school day.
While going through ALICE training prepared me for an active shooter, it also stripped away my idea that school was a safe place to learn. While I never consciously considered if my school was unsafe, my teachers telling us potential classroom items that could be our weapons and our escape routes shattered my assumed perception of safety. It is a harsh reality students must face to protect themselves.”
Lea: “Moreover, I know that my high school often held lockdown drills to prepare students for active shooter situations. Unfortunately, students did not take these drills seriously, and I felt relatively unprepared in the instance of a lockdown. While I grew up in a relatively small community in Northern Michigan, I wished that more schools adopted trainings, and extensive drills that encourage students to recognize the risk of active shooter situations, to take responsibility for holding school administration accountable, and to communicate potential threats in the area. Based on my experiences, I felt underprepared, and ill-informed on how to manage active shooter situations. Sadly, these strategies to better prepare and inform students do not solve the larger societal issues at hand. We need drastic change, and political activism to curate deep, and lasting change."
How do students respond to school shootings? While we are speaking from the perspective of a middle class, suburbians, outside of mandatory school trainings, we have seen students hold discussions on potential solutions, participate in walkouts, advocate for their lives to their school administration, honor the lives of victims, and so much more. Students have taken nonviolent means to end violent action. Their bravery in advocacy has brought significant attention to the prevalence of gun violence in schools but students are still waiting on legislation that will create formidable change. Instead of asking students to prepare for the worst, our leaders must pass legislation and take action that favors students and helps prevent active shootings in schools.
March for Our Lives (April, 2018)
Paige: “I remember my school participated in a National Walkout Day where students across America left their schools, holding signs that called for an end to gun violence and the need for legislators, school administrators, and communities to act. When walking those couple of miles, we were not just advocating for our safety but also, we were fighting for our lives and our need to be safe in schools.
The lack of action from our leaders is an action against our lives. Until we see change, I know the students after me will not give up. We will walk-out of our schools, speak to our administrators, and keep a conversation going on our safety until we see change. Until our lives are valued and protected.”
In acknowledging the events in Oxford, and the significant threat that gun violence poses to our youth, Nonviolence International (NVI) seeks to inspire our communities, and loved ones to take action, and support the protests against gun violence. We hope that through discussing the events in Oxford, we can work to provide our resources and knowledge on this topic.
Here is what you can do to help:
- Donate to the victims and survivors of the Oakland school shooting, organizations that advocate for gun control like the Coalition To Stop Gun Violence, and nonviolence promoters like NVI or our partners.
- Support research into gun violence.
- Sign petitions to give our students more protection.
- If you are in the United States, message your representatives calling for more gun control.
- Join movements such as the youth-led March for Lives to promote change.
We are calling for action beyond searching school backpacks and red flag laws. We need radical reform to reverse the US Supreme Court’s new interpretation of the 2nd amendment, efforts to ban semi and automatic weapons, and more laws to protect children from gun use. Gun violence is yet another symptom of the epidemic of violence in our communities. NVI calls on all people everywhere to rise up against the forces of dehumanization and destruction all around us. We are stronger together, please join us in protecting our students.
Latest posts
The Power of the Powerless:
Nonviolent Resistance Begins with Ordinary Acts
In the midst of cascading global crises - war, repression, climate breakdown, and democratic backsliding, the world briefly paused this week to listen to Canada’s prime minister’s speech at the World Economic Forum, in Davos. Mark Carney opened his speech with an unexpected story: The Power of the Powerless.
The reference comes from a 1978 essay by Czech dissident and playwright Václav Havel, who would later become president of Czechoslovakia. It remains one of the most important texts on authoritarianism and nonviolent resistance. What makes his analysis enduring is not simply its critique of repression, but its clarity in explaining a question many people still struggle to articulate: why do authoritarian systems persist even when few genuinely believe in them? Havel’s answer is both unsettling and empowering: because society participates in the lie, not necessarily out of conviction, but out of habit, fear, and self-preservation.
Authoritarianism is sustained not only by force, but by conformity. Authoritarian regimes are often imagined as systems held together exclusively by violence, and Havel does not deny the role of coercion, but he argues that the more efficient form of control is subtler: fear that becomes routine. Such systems function because millions of ordinary people quietly adjust their behavior to what is expected of them and, over time, this compliance becomes normalized. People learn how to perform loyalty without believing it. In this sense, authoritarian power depends less on ideological devotion and more on daily participation in a collective performance. This is what Havel calls “living within the lie.”
One of the essay’s most famous examples is that of a greengrocer who places a political slogan in his shop window, written “Workers of the world, unite!” The key point is not the slogan itself, but why it is displayed. The greengrocer does not post it because he believes in it. He does so to signal that he understands the rules of the game. The sign becomes a silent message: I am obedient. I will not cause trouble.
Here, Havel exposes a fundamental weakness of authoritarian systems: they rely on these visible rituals of submission. Such gestures reassure the regime and society that everyone is still playing their assigned role. So Havel asks a deceptively simple question: What happens if the greengrocer removes the sign? He does not topple the regime. But some things do change:
- the ritual is broken
- the illusion of consensus cracks
- the system’s dependence on performance becomes visible
And once that happens, others begin to see that the system is not inevitable.
“Living in truth” as Nonviolent Action
For Havel, the real power of the “powerless” lies in choosing to “live in truth.” This is not a moral slogan, but a practical decision to stop reproducing messages one does not believe, to refuse participation in the lie that sustains the system. These acts may appear small. That is precisely why they are powerful. Nonviolent resistance does not always begin with mass protests or dramatic confrontation. Often, it begins with:
- a worker who refuses to repeat propaganda
- a teacher who teaches honestly
- an artist who creates despite censorship
- a journalist who documents reality
- a neighbor who protects another
- a community that organizes itself
To live in truth is a form of nonviolent direct action - one that interrupts automatic obedience. When ordinary people withdraw their participation from the daily theater of obedience, slogans lose their power, fear loses its monopoly, silence no longer signals consent, and truth begins to circulate again. From a nonviolent perspective, political change often emerges not as a clash of force, but as a crisis of obedience.
Why The Power of the Powerless Matters Today
Havel also points toward a strategy deeply aligned with contemporary nonviolent movements: the creation of parallel structures: spaces of social, cultural, and civic life that exist beyond the regime’s control. Rather than waiting for a single moment of rupture, these initiatives build long-term resilience:
- independent cultural spaces
- community networks
- alternative education
- solidarity economies
- independent media
- civil society organizations
Often, repression does not arrive only as open violence, it appears as normalization: cynicism, self-censorship, isolation, and the belief that “nothing can be done.” Havel’s essay offers a crucial reminder:
Power does not reside only at the top.
Power is embedded in daily life.
And so is the possibility of change.
When people choose to live in truth, they create the conditions authoritarian systems fear most: a society that begins to recognize its own agency. Havel shows that obedience has mechanisms. So does resistance.
Nonviolence, in practice, is the collective refusal to sustain a lie as a form of governance.
It is the patient reconstruction of public life through truth, solidarity, and dignity.
History does not change only when people seize institutions. Often, it changes when people decide, together, to stop performing for power.
Dear friend,
This year we invite you to re-read Dr. King’s Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, (or you can watch it on here).
“I conclude that this award which I receive on behalf of that movement is a profound recognition that nonviolence is the answer to the crucial political and moral question of our time – the need for man to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to violence and oppression…. we will know that we are living in the creative turmoil of a genuine civilization struggling to be born…I refuse to accept the cynical notion that nation after nation must spiral down a militaristic stairway into the hell of thermonuclear destruction. I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality.”
Despite making much progress in alleviating racism, sexism and reducing global poverty, we see violence and injustice growing in wars and occupations that destroy civilian life, in places like Palestine, Sudan, Western Sahara, Burma, Ukraine, Uganda, and the Congo. The world has surpassed 100 million refugees, as militarism and war have accelerated.
We see governments across the world suppress dissent and weaken human rights in the name of “security.” Racialized police violence continues. Mass incarceration that destroys communities. Economic inequality is growing while basic needs go unmet. Voting rights are under attack. Protest is criminalized. Migrants are treated as threats rather than human beings.
In the United States, the home of Dr. King, the US government is abetting genocide, attacking constitutional and international laws and institutions, and throwing the world over the cliff into climate chaos, all for the sake of transferring vast wealth and power to the few.
Nonviolence International exists because we refuse to accept this as normal.
Nonviolence is harder than violence. We are not going to kill or threaten our way to a just and sustainable future. We must use persuasion, nonviolent coercion, the rule of law, global cooperation and governance in order to survive and thrive. And we must bring on board the huge segments of humanity who succumb to greed and cruelty and elect abusive leaders out of fear or coercion.
Nonviolence is a way of resisting violence without becoming it.
It is organized, courageous, and disciplined. It is about telling the truth, confronting power, and standing with those who are most impacted.
Dr. King understood that nonviolence demands commitment. It demands action. And it demands a willingness to be uncomfortable for the sake of justice.
Following Dr. King’s example, we ask you to write or video record your own speech on nonviolence! You can write for the world, but we ask that you do it to your kids, your community, and/or your country and in your native language.
We will help you publish it on our website or tag / collaborate us on Instagram and Facebook!
The arc of the moral universe does not bend by itself. It bends when people choose to act.
Thank you for walking this path with us, today and every day.
In solidarity,
Michael Beer & Sami Awad, Co-Directors
P.S. Register for our upcoming webinar: Beyond Political Illusions: What This Moment Demands of Us, on Jan 21, at 10AM ET / 5PM Jerusalem time. We will have a powerful panel, including Jonathan Kuttab, Huwaida Arraf, and Jeff Halper.
This Webinar on January 21, at 10AM ET and 5PM Jerusalem time, entitled Beyond Political Illusions: What This Moment Demands of Us is a strategic conversation bringing together Jonathan Kuttab, Huwaida Arraf, and Jeff Halper. Building on earlier discussions that focused on NVI’s book “Beyond the Two State Solution” this webinar responds to the current reality of genocide, escalating violence, and deepening impunity across Palestine. Our guests will clarify what international law and moral responsibility require of us now to manifest a new society committed to nonviolence, justice, equality, and the dignity of life. Register here!
Goals:
- Support Jeff Halper’s 1 state campaign
- Encourage worldwide book groups around Jonathan’s book
- Clarify the political reality in Palestine and move beyond dominant political frameworks that have collapsed
- Explore what international law, nonviolent action and moral responsibility require of individuals and movements
- Challenge all the existent political frameworks and question how individuals and movements can actually push for alternative frameworks to be put in action
Nonviolence Must Prevail in Iran
As we write this, the people of Iran are demonstrating in the streets of their cities and towns for the last 3 weeks.. They are calling for change and demanding to be heard, despite the violence they are facing from their own government — the death toll may be over 2000 people. The world needs to understand what is happening and why we must respond with urgency and wisdom.
What Is Happening in Iran?
In late December 2025, shopkeepers in Tehran closed their stores. These were not political radicals,these were ordinary business owners who could no longer survive. The cost of food had risen dramatically, after Iran's currency, the rial, lost nearly half its value in 2025. What began as protests about the economy quickly became something much larger. People across Iran, students, pensioners, young people, merchants, took to the streets. They are now calling not just for economic relief, but for fundamental change in how their country is governed. The protests have spread to at least 185 cities. Demonstrations have erupted on university campuses. The chants in the streets express deep frustration: "Death to the Dictator" and "Neither Gaza nor Lebanon, My Life for Iran."
This is not the first time Iranians have risen up. Many remember the Woman, Life, Freedom protests in 2022 after Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman, died in custody after being arrested for not wearing her hijab "correctly." Those demonstrations were met with brutal force—tear gas, mass arrests, and live ammunition. Hundreds died and thousands were imprisoned, but Iranians now state that the morality police are less visible in many urban areas, and many women are openly foregoing the veil without immediate crackdowns.
But the roots go deeper. For decades, Iranians have lived under a system where one man, the Shah Pahlavi, and then the Religious Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, holds ultimate power over all major decisions. Elections happen, but real power remains concentrated in an unelected official. Young Iranians, who make up a large portion of the population,see no future for themselves. They watch their government spend money supporting armed groups in other countries while they struggle at home. They see corruption, mismanagement, and their voices ignored.
The government blames Iran's economic problems on international sanctions—restrictions placed on Iran by other countries, particularly the United States. While sanctions have certainly contributed to economic hardship, Iran's leaders have begun to admit that their own governance failures share responsibility. President Masoud Pezeshkian, elected in 2024 on promises of economic reform, acknowledged this reality even as the protests spread.
The Violence We Condemn
We are deeply concerned about active violence from all sides. Some protesters have thrown stones and burned government buildings. Government armed actors have been killed. We understand the rage that drives such actions, but we believe that sustainable democratic change comes through disciplined, nonviolent resistance.
Our greatest concern, however, is the violence perpetrated by the Iranian government. The state possesses a complete monopoly on weapons—guns, tear gas, riot control equipment, and the entire security apparatus. Reports indicate that hundreds of protesters have been killed, many shot at close range with live ammunition. Thousands have been arrested. Iran's attorney general has warned that protesters could face charges carrying the death penalty.
The government has shut down internet access in many areas, cutting Iranians off from the outside world and making it difficult to document what is happening. In 2025, Iran executed at least 1,500 people—the highest number in nearly 40 years—as part of what appears to be a deliberate strategy to instill fear. As adherents to Islam, a religion espousing peace, this violence against your own people is haram and unacceptable.
We call on the US and Israel to stop their attacks and continued threats of bombing and regime change. Some desperate Iranians have unwisely called for foreign armed intervention hoping for some miracle. This is more likely to increase government repression.
International sanctions, particularly those imposed by the United States, have for the most part devastated Iran's economy. These sanctions fall most heavily on ordinary Iranians—the same people now protesting in the streets. Sanctions make food more expensive. They restrict access to medicine. They destroy jobs and opportunities. In effect, the international community is punishing the Iranian people for the actions of a government they did not choose and cannot change through normal democratic means.
What the World Must Do
The United States and the international community must lift economic sanctions on Iran. Sanctions strengthen authoritarian governments by giving them an external enemy to blame, by forcing citizens to depend on the state for survival, and by creating a siege mentality that makes reform more difficult. Lifting sanctions would empower the Iranian people. It would improve their economic conditions and give them breathing room to organize and demand change. It would remove the government's favorite excuse for economic failure. And it would demonstrate that the international community stands with the Iranian people, not against them. A best outcome would be for the US and other nations to pay reparations for unwarranted suffering. The US and the UN should call for and enforce a Nuclear Weapons Free Middle East (West Asia).
A Nonviolent Path Forward
We call on the Iranian government to recognize the legitimate grievances of its people, and to engage in dialogue and compromise rather than violence. When a government responds to peaceful protest with bullets, it reveals its own weakness and desperation.
The best outcome we can envision is a referendum on Iran's constitution and genuinely free elections where Iranians can choose their own path forward. The current constitution concentrates power in the hands of unelected religious authorities. The previous constitution did so with an unelected monarch.
Iranians deserve the opportunity to decide what kind of country they want to live in.
What matters is that the Iranian people are the ones who determine their future. Not foreign governments, not military intervention, not external pressure. The people themselves, through their courage and their commitment to justice. We have witnessed people power transform nations—from the Philippines to Poland to Chile to South Africa. We have seen ordinary citizens, armed only with their conviction and their willingness to stand together, overcome seemingly invincible authoritarian systems. The path is never easy. The cost is often high. But change is possible.
Our Message to the People of Iran
You are not alone. The world sees you and our courage inspires us. Your determination to build a better future for yourselves and your children gives us hope.
As part of developing any nonviolent strategy in any situation, certain issues are important to take into account. We urge you to remain disciplined in your protests. We understand that the government uses violence out of desperation, but we encourage Iranians to continue to use measures that sometimes lowers the violence and in some cases improves effectiveness:
- Protest primarily during the day time.
- Invite all people, including women, elderly and children to participate.
- Support the creation of a national network of Mothers and Families of the Martyrs.
- Video record everything.
- Denounce attacks on mosques or Islam, even though many see that the religion has been corrupted and misused by state power.
- Look to the medical community for emerging and credible alternative leadership.
- Build mutual aid networks
- Use of non-cooperation techniques such as boycotts and merchant strikes.
- Use of tactics dispersed over a large area.
- Build unity with the diaspora in spite of its extreme elements.
Nonviolent resistance is not passive, it is strategic. It builds broader support, both within Iran and internationally. It withdraws support for the pillars of power, particularly if society uses tax resistance and general strikes.We know that many of you are feeling desperate and wanting revenge for the suffering. But feelings and violent revolution without modern weapons will likely not achieve your goals. You are welcome to get more ideas on possible tactics from our catalogue of 346 tactics in our huge global database and also explained in our Farsi language downloadable book, Civil Resistance Tactics of the 21st Century.
To the international community: Do not abandon the Iranian people in their hour of need. Sanctions are not solidarity. Lift the economic restrictions that make their lives harder. Support their right to determine their own future. And make clear that the world is watching how their government responds.
The road ahead for Iran is uncertain. But in the streets of Tehran, Isfahan, Tabriz, and hundreds of other cities, the Iranian people are writing a new chapter in their long history. They are reclaiming their voice and demanding their dignity. They are showing the world that the human spirit cannot be crushed, no matter how heavily the boot presses down.
History will remember this moment. Let us ensure that history records not just the suffering, but the courage. Not just the violence, but the resistance. Not just the crisis, but the possibility of transformation. The people of Iran are crying out for justice. The question is whether the world will listen—and whether we will respond with wisdom, compassion, and solidarity.