by Emily Mattioli
With the gift of New York bagels, Zoya Craig visited the Nonviolence international D.C. office last week. We discussed her life, one that has led her to D.C., a Master’s Degree in Global Affairs, Asia, and now in her current role as operations manager at Control Arms—one of Nonviolence International’s partners.
We believe that Control Arms is unique and vital in it’s role as an organization working against the proliferation of weapons. They look beyond the immediate and direct lethality of fire arms to acknowledge that the moneyed distribution of such weapons contributes to a broader form of human suffering.
“Let’s use Kenya as an example,” said Craig. Banners with hundreds of pins hung behind her as she painted a picture of what arms trade means for regular citizens around the globe. Imagine these Kenyan villagers are cattle farmers, which is how they eat and provide for their families. One group of farmers might illegally attain weapons from Uganda which they could then use to terrorize the other cattle farmers in the village.
Under the power and protection of the arms they’ve acquired, the group can steal or destroy their competitor’s businesses in order to advance their own. If the farmer from Kenya had a gun, to protect his farm, almost certainly there would have be immediate loss of life in the situation. If the family came outside, think of how they may have been coerced or manipulated as they looked down the barrel of a gun. Even if the terrorizing parties don’t directly take a life, by taking land and goods, they are destroying livelihoods. The people targeted by this threat are now physically removed from their homes, and they have no cattle to eat or trade with. While the ultimate cause of death may be starvation or disease, it began with a gun.
A Policy Advisor at Oxfam noted, “In the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo, for example, large numbers of people have been killed directly, either in combat or in the crossfire. However, 95 percent of the deaths were caused not by bullets, but by malnutrition or preventable diseases such as malaria, which were contracted when people were forced out of their homes by the conflict.” These aren’t far fetched scenarios, but what happens around the world, daily. This is why Control Arms is so passionate about their mission. They understand that controlling arms will not only lead to less loss of life, but also combat human rights abuses and poverty.
Control Arms is a part of a global campaign for arms control, spearheaded by Oxfam, Amnesty International, and IANSA. While there are many activities done by this grassroots movement and advocacy organization, the heart of it all is the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)—the first global treaty to regulate arms trade. After being voted on by a consensus, multiple states around the world began signing on and some have already begun the process of ratification. To date, ATT has been one of the fastest treaties to enter into force, speaking to it’s value and necessity. It is a comprehensive treaty that addresses a variety of problems that are intertwined with the issue of unregulated arms.
Another first for this treaty is it’s focus on highlighting gender based violence as a motivation for denying arms trade. It is not just the surplus of weapons in ‘the wrong hands’, or even in war, but the role of weapons in domestic violence that Control Arms seeks to address.
Not from traditional acts of nonviolence alone, like strikes and boycotts, but through legislation this group is at the center of an international movement. The work of Control Arms is fairly evident in it’s relevance to Nonviolence International’s mission. This is a group tirelessly working at every level, from religious leaders to policy experts, lawyers to healthcare professionals, to change laws regarding arms and societies attitude toward this issue.
Whereas the majority of Americans do not suffer the direct consequences of arms trade, they are complicit in its proliferation. A large portion of U.S. taxes fund the the defense budget which leads to weapon pollution around the world and the loss of lives. We must recognize the role we play in violence. Not just as Americans, but as global citizens, to take responsibility for our involvement in the face of our passive contributions to arms enabled violence. Countries like Sweden, Belgium, and Norway have already done so in pulling out of arms deals with Saudi Arabia that contributed to the war in Yemen. Control Arms work is yielding very real results.
“I remember sitting in the peanut gallery [at a UN General Assembly meeting] after so many negotiations and over a decade of work, to see enough countries come together where it actually happened,” Craig vividly recalls the day that the UN adopted ATT, despite fighting over other issues on the agenda. Although she had only joined on a year prior, the joy in the room was palpable. There was hope that drastic reductions in armed violence were possible, and to this day more states are signing on to the treaty.
Human suffering, including poverty and gender-based violence, are consequences of the extensive arms trade. Control Arms’ work has radically contributed to battling this global issue, and we’re proud to call ourselves their partners. We stand beside Control Arms as they continue to foster peace in the world.
For more information about Control Arms or the Arms Trade Treaty visit their website, https://controlarms.org/, and sign up for their annual report to follow the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty.
Latest posts
Remember Dr. King's statement that humanity MUST choose between nonviolence or nonexistence? The answer is obvious and we need to build global movements that use the tools and values of nonviolence now more than ever.
Not including NVI, below are 17 leading groups that inspire, train or mobilize nonviolent resistance and social change. All work multi-nationally and across multiple social movements.
Please consider becoming a consistent monthly or annual donor and ask yourself if you can devote 1% of your income to the global nonviolence movement. Can you devote $/€ 5/month to each of them? Please, also, contact them or visit them and see how you can volunteer.
All of these groups are in financial need and have great potential. Those with asterixes are in most need. Please flag/star this email so that you can come back to it repeatedly and try not to skim. (They are listed here in no particular order).
*Africans Rising- “The Movement envisions that Africa-wide activism, solidarity and unity of purpose of the Peoples of Africa will build the future they want – a right to justice, peace, dignity and shared prosperity.”
Acción Noviolenta en las Américas- “Education, Training and Research in the Americas in Spanish, French and Portuguese.’ Please join the webinars that we co-organize with them.
The Institute Novact of Nonviolence “is a non-profit association dedicated to conflict transformation and peacebuilding. It has been working in the Euro-Mediterranean region for more than 20 years."
CANVAS-”From CANVAS' headquarters in Belgrade, Serbia, we operate a network of international trainers and consultants with expertise in building and running successful nonviolent movements. We work to build more just, democratic, and responsible society.” Srda Popovich and Slobodan Djinovic are brilliant people-power coaches.
Commons Library: A world-class open English library of training and organizing materials. Also grassroots-engaged and activist in Australia. Operates on a shoe-string.
Ekta Parishad “is a mass-based peoples’ movement for land rights with an active membership of 250,000 landless poor and is regarded as the biggest peoples’ movement in India with an iconic status globally. Since its inception as a Gandhian organization in 1989, Ekta Parishad is constantly promoting nonviolence as a way of struggle, dialogue, and constructive actions toward building a peaceful and just society.”Ekta Parishad is a mass-based with an iconic status globally." Ramesh Sharma is simply brilliant.
*Kawakibbi Foundation “is an organisation which merges intellectual research with activism. The foundation was born out of the Arab Spring, and we work towards a world free of tyranny and in which society trumps the state, extremism in all its forms have no appeal, and individual rights are sacrosanct.’ NVI met with Ahmed Gatnash this year and was so impressed that we will soon fiscally sponsor them.
NVXXI-Non-Violence XXI “est une association française qui collecte des dons et des legs depuis 2001 dans le but de financer des projets à caractère non-violent et de promouvoir concrètement la culture de la non-violence au 21e siècle en France et dans le monde. Elle regroupe aujourd’hui les principales organisations non-violentes françaises.”
Mouvement pour une Alternative Non-violente. “Founded in 1974, MAN aims to put forward the specific contribution of non-violence in the everyday life, education and social and political fights. MAN wants to promote the principles and methods of nonviolent strategy, to support a positive resolution of the interpersonal, intercommunity or international conflicts. By thinking, acting and training, MAN thus seeks to promote justice and freedom.”
Beautiful Trouble. A great online resource center for creative nonviolent action and training. A leader in support of artistic activism and social change. It's co-led by the extraordinary Nadine Bloch.
Metta Center & Nonviolence Radio. They have wonderful podcasts and many Gandhian inspired resources. Michael Nagler and Stephanie Van Hook are a treasure.
Pace E Bene: “Founded in 1989 by the Franciscan Friars of California, Pace e Bene Nonviolence Service is now an independent, non-denominational 501(c)3 organization spreading the power of nonviolence. “Pace e Bene” (pronounced “pah-chay bay-nay”) is an Italian greeting from St. Francis and St. Clare of Assisi meaning “Peace and all Good.” Pace E Bene coordinates Campaign Nonviolence with the help of the indefatigable Ken Butigan and many others.
Nonviolence News “Each week, Nonviolence News brings 30-50 stories of “nonviolence in action” to readers, illuminating the scale and scope of how nonviolence is actively shaping our world.” This weekly newsletter is the best site for nonviolent action news and movements, thanks to the superstar Rivera Sun.
Waging Nonviolence: “Waging Nonviolence is a nonprofit media organization dedicated to providing original reporting and expert analysis of social movements around the world. With a commitment to accuracy, transparency and editorial independence, we examine today’s most crucial issues by shining a light on those who are organizing for just and peaceful solutions.” They have great in-depth articles about nonviolent movements. NVI fiscally sponsored WN for years before they spun off under the inspired leadership of Eric Stoner and others.
*Solidarity 2020 and Beyond “is one of the broadest international networks composed of grassroots leaders utilizing nonviolent action to work together strategically on key issues at the local and international level including climate crisis, women's rights, anti-authoritarianism, indigenous and land rights, and self-determination. S2020B is active in 100+ countries, mainly in the Global South, where we build people power and impact by providing expert level training and spaces for members to learn and share with each other., trauma healing and self-care, participatory research projects, and emergency and small grants to empower locally led initiatives working for peace with justice and positive change. We provide small grants to locally-led advocacy campaigns and activities such as International Peace Day for youth in Kenya; nonviolent action training workshops in Mekong River countries and Palestine; Social Justice clubs in Uganda, environmentalists in El Salvador, and support for tribal and marketplace women in Cameroon and India. Dr. Stephen Zunes, a S2020B Organizing Committee member describes S2020B as "the most effective and efficient international network of grassroots activists making a real difference in the world that I have had the pleasure to work with". NVI fiscally sponsors S2020B and its Director Katherine Hughes-Fraitekh.
Training For Change: “Training for Change is a training and capacity building organization for activists and organizers. They believe strong training and group facilitation is vital to movement building for social justice and radical change. One of the great training collectives”. Founded by none other than our dear friend George Lakey.
*Nonviolence Education and Research Center in Turkey. This is the primary resource center for the many countries with Turkish language speakers supporting all kinds of marginalized communities. Training, research, activism in a challenging environment. Based in Istanbul. NVI helped found this center.
Sincerely,
Sami Awad & Michael Beer, Co-Directors
P.S. Please let us know of more groups that we could highlight next year. If you are really wanting to focus on Palestine, please look at NVI's remarkable partners who are supporting Israelis and Palestinians who seek to build a shared future together.
Diversity and Equity as an Act of Nonviolent Civil Resistance
In a time when societal and institutional shifts are met with increasing polarization, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is not just a matter of social progress—it is an act of nonviolent resistance. For organizations, companies, and communities, embracing these principles is a powerful statement of defiance against the structures that have historically perpetuated inequality and exclusion.
In the spirit of nonviolence, this article challenges the misguided notion that diversity and equity are mere buzzwords or trends. Instead, it asserts that these principles have always been foundational to thriving organizations and successful business models. Just as nonviolent civil resistance seeks to dismantle systemic oppression without resorting to harm, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion disrupts the perpetuation of privilege and opens pathways to fairness, justice, and mutual respect.
The American ideal of meritocracy—the belief that hard work and talent should determine success—has shaped generations. It’s the foundation of the American Dream: if you’re driven and capable, you will succeed, no matter your background. But is that really how it works?
History tells a different story. Deep-rooted inequities in race, class, and systemic privilege have long obstructed true meritocracy. The reality is that talent alone isn’t enough when barriers to opportunity are unevenly distributed. If we want to honor the principle of merit, we must ensure everyone has a fair chance to prove their worth.
This is where Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) come in. Contrary to misconceptions, DEIA isn’t about lowering standards or prioritizing one group over another. It’s about eliminating obstacles that unfairly limit access to opportunity. Done right, DEIA strengthens—not weakens—meritocracy by ensuring that success is based on ability, not privilege.
One of the most persistent myths about meritocracy is that success is always earned. If someone is wealthy or powerful, the assumption is that they must have worked harder, been smarter, or deserved it more than others. But is that the case?
The word “deserve” implies entitlement—something granted, not necessarily earned. A child born into privilege does not inherently deserve better education, healthcare, or career prospects than a child born into poverty. Yet, in practice, society frequently rewards people not for their abilities but for the advantages they were handed at birth.
True merit should be based on talent, effort, and achievement. But when access to education, economic stability, and career opportunities is skewed by race, gender, and class, meritocracy becomes a convenient illusion. Without addressing these structural imbalances, what we call “merit” often turns out to be nothing more than inherited privilege.
Beyond systemic barriers lies an even deeper question: Who determines what is valuable?
Historically, the dominant culture has defined success in ways that benefit those already in power. This is why unpaid labor—such as caregiving and domestic work, disproportionately performed by women and marginalized groups—has been chronically undervalued, despite its vital role in society. It’s why certain career paths, often occupied by privileged groups, are disproportionately rewarded with wealth and status, while others remain underpaid and overlooked.
The same bias applies to education and professional advancement. People from underrepresented backgrounds often have to work twice as hard to have their skills recognized because traditional measures of merit reflect the values of those who have always held power. DEIA seeks to change this by expanding our definition of value, ensuring that different perspectives, talents, and lived experiences are acknowledged and rewarded. Without this shift, meritocracy remains a closed system that excludes countless individuals who could contribute just as much, if not more, given the chance.
DEIA: An Evolution of Merit, Not an Abandonment of It
Critics often argue that these initiatives undermine meritocracy. But that argument misses the point. DEIA is not about giving unqualified people an advantage—it’s about making sure qualified people aren’t excluded due to systemic bias.
The idea isn’t to replace one group with another or push an agenda but to remove barriers that have historically shut out diverse, talented individuals. Done correctly, DEIA hiring ensures that merit remains the primary factor while broadening the pool of candidates to reflect the diversity of our society.
DEIA’s advocates recognize the challenges of implementation. Critics are right to demand clarity and rigor, particularly in fields where technical accuracy is paramount. But this is not an either-or proposition—it is an evolution of merit, not an abandonment of it. Efforts to widen the talent pool and address systemic inequities by fostering inclusion do not dilute excellence; they strengthen it.
The broader question we should be asking is: How do we balance addressing systemic inequities while ensuring that processes remain transparent and fair for everyone?
Like any policy, DEIA initiatives can be poorly executed. Some organizations have implemented it in ways that feel performative, leading to tokenism or hiring practices that prioritize optics over ability. These missteps should be addressed—but they don’t invalidate the core purpose.
Consider corporate diversity programs that hire candidates from underrepresented backgrounds but fail to provide mentorship or support. These efforts may look good on paper but do little to ensure long-term success. The solution isn’t to eliminate these values but to refine them—to ensure that equity efforts are substantive rather than symbolic.
Throwing out these principles due to flawed implementation would be like abandoning democracy because of political corruption. The answer isn’t to dismantle it but to make it work better. One way to do this is to expand the discussion beyond race and immigration because the real impact is much broader. True meritocracy requires removing barriers for all people—regardless of disability, gender, economic background, or any other factor that has historically been used to exclude individuals from opportunity.
A fair society does not measure merit based on how well someone fits into a narrow mold of success. Instead, it recognizes talent, effort, and potential in all their forms. The ultimate goal is to level the playing field so that everyone has an equal shot at success—one that isn’t determined by privilege or systemic disadvantage.
The truth is, DEIA has likely played a role in the life of someone you know and care about, even if you haven’t noticed it. Whether it’s ensuring accessibility for a disabled friend, promoting workplace fairness for women, or creating opportunities for first-generation college students, these initiatives make our society more just and inclusive.
Rather than eliminating it, we should be working to refine and strengthen these policies so they can better serve their purpose. If we truly believe in the promise of meritocracy, we must acknowledge that it can only exist when every individual has the same opportunities to succeed—not just the privileged few.
DEI as Nonviolent Civil Resistance
Implementing these practices—especially at a time when the White House is pushing back on these initiatives—becomes an act of nonviolent civil resistance. By continuing to embrace these practices, CEOs, business leaders, and other decision-makers are standing up for justice and equity despite political pressure to abandon them. This resistance is not about confrontation, but about maintaining a commitment to fairness and inclusion in the face of systemic oppression. As Cesar Chavez said, “We cannot seek achievement for ourselves and forget about progress and prosperity for our community… Our ambitions must be broad enough to include the aspirations and needs of others, for their sakes and for our own.”
Practical Steps for Business Leaders
Even when facing a cultural backlash against DEIA initiatives, CEOs, owners, executives, and Board of Trustees can continue to uphold diversity, equity, and inclusion in meaningful ways. Here are a few practical steps:
- Commit to Long-Term Change Over Short-Term Solutions: True DEI efforts go beyond hiring quotas. Invest in training and programs that support diverse employees’ growth and ensure they have access to mentorship, leadership opportunities, and career advancement. Measure your progress through data but also listen to employees’ feedback and adapt strategies to their needs.
- Cultivate an Inclusive Workplace Culture: Focus on creating a culture of belonging where all employees feel heard, valued, and empowered. This involves breaking down silos, encouraging collaboration across diverse teams, and taking active steps to address microaggressions and biases.
- Foster Equity Through Transparent Decision-Making: Evaluate policies, pay structures, and career development opportunities to ensure they don’t unintentionally exclude marginalized groups. Implement transparent, equitable processes for promotion, compensation, and hiring.
As Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, has powerfully stated: "The opposite of poverty is not wealth. The opposite of poverty is justice." Similarly, the true measure of these programs is not how many diverse candidates are hired or included but whether these initiatives genuinely contribute to justice by addressing the systemic barriers that have long excluded marginalized groups.
In the face of corporate retreats from these commitments, it’s important to remember that the true goal of such initiatives isn’t merely to increase representation or check boxes. The American Dream should not be a myth. It should be a reality for everyone.
George Cassidy Payne has over 20 years of experience in the nonprofit sector, working across various capacities to empower communities and drive social change. He holds a Master’s degree in the Humanities from Emory University, where he developed a strong foundation in critical thinking, ethics, and human behavior. George’s career has focused on advocacy, organizational leadership, and building inclusive environments that champion diversity, equity, and social justice. Passionate about creating systems that promote fair opportunities for all, he continues to work on initiatives that align with his belief in the power of diversity to drive both organizational success and positive societal impact.
